This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicates: Is a variable named i unacceptable?
In some interfaces I wrote I\'d like to name generic type parameters with more than one character to make the code more readable.
I\'m creating some Maven artifacts for various dependencies for our projects, and while I\'m taking my best guess at group / artifact IDs, I\'d like to add something to flag the开发者_StackOverflow中文
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
i have two tables in my database : Users : contain user information UserTypes : contain the names of user types ( student , teach开发者_Go百科er , specialist ) - I can\'t rename it to \'Types\' as
When using the MVC pattern, which 开发者_如何学GoI\'m not terribly experienced with, I find myself naming things like this:
In the C language where did they come up with the name atoi for converting a string to an integer? The only thing I can think of is Array To Integer for an acronym but that doesn\'t really make sense开
My team is starting a brand new ASP.NET solution which will probably become large.Inspired by ASP.NET MVC, we currently express all data access objects in a model project.We, however, do not have good
I run into this frequently enough that I thought I\'d see what others had to say about it. Using the StyleCop conventions, I find that I often have a property name that is hard to make different than
I am using a proprietary languag开发者_StackOverflowe called VGL which really does not type variables at all.
加载中,请稍侯......