I just wondered if comments are included in binaries开发者_JS百科, or does the compiler know to remove them?Objective C, just like plain C, uses the preprocessor to do that kind of stuff. The compiler
I am wondering where is the borderline between grammar specification and semantic analysis. What is better: to use a detailed grammar description or leave the details for semantic phase? For example:
I was trying the Hello pass example in the \"Writing an LLVM Pass\" webpage.I followed the instructions to compile (with gcc-4.2) the Hello.cpp, but I got the compile errors:
Read my question thoroughly before responding, I know there’s a site called wonderfl.net I‘ve got the Flex SDK 4 on my Mac and I found a way to compile AS3 into SWF files using Flex\'s mxmlc compil
\"There is no such thing as a \"compiled language\" or \"interpreted language\". Whether a language impl开发者_StackOverflowementer chooses to write a compiler, an interpreter or anything in between i
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this
Some background: I am writing a generic high-level to low-level compiler.On the high-level side, it understands classes, methods, fields, virtual method calls, etc. and on the low-level side, it under
There are several languages/runtimes atop the JVM: such as JRuby, Groovy, Jython, Clojure, Rhino, Scala, and so on...
I\'d like to consume Mono\'s compiler as a service from my regular .NET 3.5 application. I\'ve downloaded the latest bits (2.6.7), created a simple console application in Visual Studio and referenced
My dilemma is that I need to compile a large amount of projects and solutions as per the configuration settings specified in the files. I\'ve found a few different ways to do this, and I\'ve landed on