I got a library that internally uses Boost\'s version of shared_ptr and exposes only those. For my application, I\'d like to use std::shared_ptr whenever possible though. Sadly, there is no direct con
This question already has answers here: 开发者_开发百科 Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: enable_shared_from_this - empty internal weak pointer?
boost::array<uint8_t,1000> buffer; ByteBuffer b((boost::shared_ptr<uint8_t>)buffer.data(), buffer.size());
I have searched the web and read through the Boost documentation about shared_ptr.There is a response on SO that says that shared_ptr for Copy-On-Write (COW) suc开发者_如何学JAVAks and that TR! has re
struct A { A(int a); }; struct B { B(); void b(std::shared_ptr<A> 开发者_开发技巧a); }; int main()
According to this page you can implicitly convert shared_ptr<Foo> to shared_ptr<const Foo>. That makes good sense.
class A {}; typedef shared_ptr<const A*> AConstPtr; typedef shared_ptr<A*> APtr; vector<APtr> ptr;
I have multiple class derivated from A class A : public boost::enable_shared_from_this<A> { public:
I found some code using std::shared_ptr to perform arbitrary cleanup at shutdown. At first I thought this code could not possibly work, but then I tried the following:
I am using shared_ptr as my garbage collection for a toy language that I am working on which compiles to C++. My objects derive from a common base class above that there are strings and numbers then t
加载中,请稍侯......