Clarification: this question is not about access modifier Confirmed that B.m() and b.m() statements both works in the following code:
Is there any difference between declaring inherited virtual function in a child class with the \"virtual\" keyword or not, considering I want to call fun appropriate to my objects\' type. Lo开发者_如何
first sorry for my poor english...I\'ve a doubt..I\'m reading the FXRuby for the pragmatic programmer..and I saw this code
I have an interface Person and I have 2 classes Female and Male that implement the interface. For the Female class, I have a method getPregnancyMonth that my Male class does not have. Adding that met
I have several classes that implement something like an IAdd interface/class: public class AddClass<T> where T : ISomething
Here is what I would like to do: class Msg { int target; public: Msg(int target): target(target) { } virtual ~Msg () { }
I am writing a class (Suite) that is inheriting from another class (HotelRoom). The HotelRoom class has a constructor that requires an argument (an int) and so in the constructor for Suite I called su
I come from a C++/Java background, but I\'m having problems getting the syntax right on this javascript. This is what I was trying to accomplish. I w开发者_Python百科ant a base class TemplateBaseView
I want to override my Python class\'s __getattribute__ and __setattr__ methods. My use case is the usual one: I have a few special names that I want to handle, and I want the default behavior for anyt
From my understanding the following code will execute in this order: Derived constructor is called. Base object is constructed using the default base constructor.
加载中,请稍侯......