In C, unlike C++, all parameters to a function definition must be named. Instead of quashing \"unused parameter\" errors with (void)a, or openly using __attribute__((unused)), I\'ve created the follo
Why would anyone pre开发者_开发百科fer Scheme macros over Common Lisp macros (and I genuinely want to know too, I\'m not trying to be a troll)?
I am facing a weird problem. I have got a file calledin which I am using a macro called \"WM_USER\", the macro is defined in another header file called . Now the problem is that when I am using the ma
I need to provide configuration file, which will describe which STL header files to include. I have found that usually it is done by defining a lot of HAVE_XXX_HEADER macros. I wonder 开发者_StackOver
I\'m exploring wxWidgets and at the same time learning C/C++.Often wxWidgets functions expect a wxString rather than a string, therefore wxWidget开发者_运维知识库s provides a macro wxT(yourString) for
I have a malloc in C that is 26901^2*sizeof(double) This got me thinking what the largest value can be here?
#undef GOOGLE_LONGLONG #undef GOOGLE_ULONGLONG #undef GOOGLE_LL_FORMAT #ifdef _MSC_VER #define GOOGLE_LONGLONG(x) x##I64
I want t开发者_开发问答o make a little script that, when pressed some specific key, for example F2, the macro starts to record the mouse actions, only the location of the click, and then play it when
I\'m trying to do some kind of Macro \"Overloading\", so that MACRO(something), gets expanded differently than MACRO(something, else).
When defining macros that headers rely on, such as _FILE_OFFSET_BITS, FUSE_USE_VERSION, _GNU_SOURCE among others, where is the best place to put them?
加载中,请稍侯......