Well, dont know if this is a bug or if I\'ve a concept error. But try to test it: A simple generic test:
I want to access - _addr residing in _sigfault which is part of siginfo structure. siginfo structure defined in asm-generic/siginfo is as follows -
I want to connect a signal开发者_运维技巧 clicked() from the button to a slot of different object.
I was going through Linux Programmer\'s Manual about Alternative Signal Stack. http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/sigaltstack.2.html
This is a little long... For starters I\'m on Linux 2.6.33, gcc 4.4.4. I\'ve written a small program, which creates a named pipe and reads it, until it sees a certain string, whereupon it gets rid of
I am trying to create a system which enables user to upload a zipfile, and then extract it using post_save signal.
I read that kill is unsafe respect to signals here. What else should I use if I want to kill 开发者_StackOverflow中文版child process as part of clean up inside my signal handler? What are my alterna
OK, so this may be an odd situation but please bear with me. I have a Python program which calls up a C++ class via a SWIG interface. I came to a point where I must asynchronously signal (to update a
If a process is currently stopped due to a SIGTRAP signal and it is se开发者_StackOverflownt a SIGSTOP signal via kill(), what would be the default behavior? Would the SIGSTOP be a pending signal that
I would like to know exactly how the execution of asynchronous signal handlers works on Linux. First, I am unclear as to which thread executes the signal handler. Second, I would like to know the step