I\'m relatively new to source control (at least complex source control). If I\'m developing a set of features in a branch,开发者_StackOverflow社区 and I happen to delete some cruft out of the source
I keep hearing that branching in git is so much easier than in SVN, because it\'s easier to merge the branch back to trunk/master. I\'ve read some tutorials, but they only covered basic merge conflict
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
I\'m trying to merge a hash with the key/values of string in ruby. i.e. h = {:day => 4, :month => 8, :year => 2010}
I\'m getting some really bizarre stuff while trying to merge multiple data frames. Help! I need to merge a bunch of data frames by the columns \'RID\' and \'VISCODE\'. Here is an example of what it l
I have 2 large databases that were shared before.I now have removed the sharing and have created a new database with all of the data except for the tables that were开发者_JAVA百科 originally shared.Is
Scenario: Programmer creates a branch for project \'fo开发者_如何学编程o\' called \'my_foo\' at revision 5
I have inherited some code (from zip开发者_开发技巧 file) from a developer and git initialzed, made changes and set of check-ins progressively.
I\'m trying to reintegrate a development branch into the trunk in my Subversion 1.5 repository. I merged all the changes from the trunk to the development branch prior to this operation. Now when I tr
I\'ve heard for instance that merging branches with git or mercurial is easier than with svn. Reading last开发者_如何转开发 Joel on software blog entry, I didn\'t get it exactly why. Could you provid
加载中,请稍侯......