I had upgraded to Ubuntu server开发者_开发问答 10.04 - however it removed SVK which I had been using for distributed-vc needs, as much of my old projects were still wrapped up in self-hosted subversio
I am using a MERGE statement to basically do an UPSERT.For the rows that are not present in the destination, I would like them inserted in a certain order.Unfortunately, it seems the ORDER BY clause i
I git the purpose of rebase. It makes sense to me. Basically i I have a feature branch I\'m working on and I\'m ready to put it into the master branch I would do a rebase to squash all of my commits i
I have some nicely-structured data that looks like this: CREATE TABLE SourceBodyPartColors ( person_ID INTEGER NOT NULL,
I\'m currently working on having dictionaries of styles and templates that I can dynamically apply to my application. Before this \"new wanted\" dynamical behavior, I had several resource dictionaries
Way I could not merge List and List? OOP says MyType2 is MyType... using System; using System.Collections.Generic;
I have a file that was modified in two different repositories and merged in my local repository after a pull. I know that one of the repositories is the actual version that I want, and don\'t want the
Mapping: <class name=\"PhoneTypeTest\" lazy=\"false\" table=\"PhoneType\"> <cache usage=\"read-write\"/>
I\'ve read about some tricks with merge in Git: merging public and private branches while while keeping certain files intact in both branches and others and not fou开发者_C百科nd a solution.
My desire is to keep my fork up to date with the parent, and ideally record the parent\'s individual commits + messages, so that I have a full history in the fork, of what changed in the parent.
加载中,请稍侯......