I wrote a class that wraps an iterator and returns transformed values on demand: // iterator-wrapper.h
I basically want to have a base container class which can return a generic iterator that can be used to traverse an instance of the container class, without needing to specify iterator templates. I th
I\'m using a boost variant to hold some generated types, right now my开发者_Python百科 code generator creates a header with the types and a variant capable of holding them.At initialization time, I\'d
The java.lang.Iterator interface has 3 methods: hasNext, next and remove. In order to implement a read-only iterator, you have to provide an implementation for 2 of those: hasNext and next.
I\'ve read here and other places that when iterating a std::vector using indexes you should: std::vector <int> x(20,1);
I have an iterator service that works fine already and returns a correctly structured values to my flex application through my Zend Amf server
I\'m iterating over a vector and need the index the iterator is currently poi开发者_StackOverflow社区nting at. What are the pros and cons of the following methods?
I need to loop over a list of objects, comparing them like this: 0 vs. 1, 1 vs. 2, 2 vs. 3, etc. (I\'m using pysvn to extract a list of diffs.) I wound up just looping over an index, but I keep wonder
I\'ve a custom container which is implemented in two different ways, but with a single interface. some thing like this.
I\'ve already looked at this question: Python iterators – how to dynamically assign self.next within a new style class?
加载中,请稍侯......