Is there a way to \"recursively redefine\" (don\'t know the technical term) prolog predicates? Consider these predicates:
member(K,[a,b,c,d]) if for one of ... What\'s the stat开发者_如何学运维ement for two of ...?Just rinse and repeat:
I can\'t开发者_开发百科 distinguish these symbols: = and =:= \\= and =\\= [X,Y] and [X|Y] What’s the difference ?For the comparison operators (=, =:=, \\=, =\\=):
My goal for this Prolog function is as follows: Given two lists, x and y, return true if y can be formed from x by reversing a contiguous part of list x.
Is there a way to test wether an arbitrary list is symmetric? For example: ?- symmetric([a,b,b,a]). true.
I am attempting to get my 开发者_如何学Carms around some basic prolog but struggling a bit in the process. In specific - I am trying to get through a list of items and copy it, item by item into a new
I\'m wondering if there\'s an (understandable) way to brute force开发者_Go百科 solve Post correspondence problem using prolog predicates?
I am trying to write a Prolog program that will print out the male successors of British Royalty in order. My attempt so far:
Hey guys, a few simple prolog questions that I\'m hoping you can help me on. Basically, I am trying to write a function that takes input as two lists, and an integer. From there, the function will try
How can I write a relation in prolog that determines if there are any two pairs in a list with the same sum.The relation should fail if there exist no pairs whose sums are equal.The relation should al
加载中,请稍侯......