We are trying to figure out a way to reorganize our unit tests and want to work out a useful way to assign responsibility to the programmer for the unit tests they\'re in charge of.
it seems that running an Android Test requires that a device or emulator is present. even this article: http://code.google.com/p/the-missing-android-xml-junit-test-runner/ requires it.
I would like to activate continuous integration for a Prism application on a TFS build server. Actually the build controller is not able to compile the application because it does not have the Prism L
I am looking to set up a continuous integration server for a python project. Normally this would build the project however as python is not built as such, what should be done instead? Just unit tests?
Short Question Is there an accepted way to run compilers / linkers for embedded software projects on a remote server and still be able to program and debug the software on local machine.
I\'m struggling to find a solution for this issue. I have a solution (VS2008) that contains around 50 projects (C#).
I would love to build XHProf output and metrics into phpUnderControl. After doing a good amount of research, it seems th开发者_Python百科e only path to XHProf is to actually change code to include and
My build scenario is like this (simplified): Compile Package (*.zip) Deploy to test environment Run tests over the environment
I use Selenium 2 (i.e. web driver) for unit testing in VS2010/TFS2010 environment. When the build (call it build # n) is triggered via checkin, the unit tests run (including Selenium ones) and after p
We\'re currently using CruiseControl.NET and NANT to run our build process. It works well, however, I\'d like to be able to make the tasks that I run for each build more granular WITHOUT creating more
加载中,请稍侯......