Let\'s say I\'m using a non-standard linked-list class, List.h. This class is functioning, template\'d and has the typical features of add/remove to front and add/remove to back, isEmpty(), etc.
Currently have a custom Linked List class that works well. I implemented a function that can export all the contents of each Node to a .txt file when the program exits. I now want to import that same
I\'m trying to implement a linked list in C, and I want to store the head node in a separate struct. However, it seems like the head node is being reassigned somehow whenever I add another node.
I suspect that LinkedLists are better than Lists/Arrays for storing sparse data and graphs. Is this c开发者_开发百科orrect? What else are they better than Lists for?Another advantage for linked lists
Got a quick question, this is part of a linked list. It determines what the size of the list is, it doesnt work very well at the moment because it keeps return开发者_如何学Going a 1 even after I add m
In a case where the only operation being performed on a list is non-rand开发者_如何学Com access (no removals, additions, or other tom-foolery), would it be advisable to use an array, ArrayList, Linked
First a little explanation of what I am trying to do: My plan is to write a program with a socket stream implemented using the boost::asio library which feeds data to a parser implemented using boost
I\'ve read that you cannot declare static variables/methods inside a generic class and I really have no idea how to solve my problem or work around it so I ask for your guidance.
If I use the standard definition of an Abstract Data Type as a black box that provides some functions to manage a collection of data, a Linked List fits that description:
I\'m building an Android app (so machines with limited resources) and I want to know how picky I should be with LinkedLists.
加载中,请稍侯......