I have a problem regarding the use of interfaces vs concrete classes. I have a base class that implements some common properties/methods. Now i have two possible extensions. Either this base class can
I\'m having a problem extending a class which itself further extends a abstract class. The base abstract class has the following methods:
I would like to create an abstract class which will create concrete instances depending on initialization parameter. Example:
If i have the following strongly-typed view: <%@ Page Title=\"\" Language=\"C#\" MasterPageFile=\"~/Views/Shared/Site.Master\" Inherits=\"System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<XXX.DomainModel.Core.Locations.
As we know that we CANNOT开发者_JAVA百科 create the instance of abstract class. I just want to know that if we create the array of abstract class, it will sure work.
Look here (Abstract Class Design): http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229047.aspx It says: (1) Do not define public or protected internal (Prot开发者_C百科ected Friend in Visual Basic) constr
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
I am planing to create an application relying on DB using Hibernate. I will have some similar classes like teacher and student and so on. In DB they will have some fields with similar names. So I wond
Consider the sample code given below: Abstract Name public abstract class Name { private String name; public Name(String name)
I\'m having trouble with the inheritance of operator=. Why doesn\'t this code work, and what is the best way to fix it?
加载中,请稍侯......