Imagine an interface hierarchy like this: public interface IAnimal { string Color { get; } } public interface ICat : IAnimal
I\'ve made the following decl开发者_JS百科aration for interfaces: public interface IBasic { int Data { get; }
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. 开发者_StackOverflow中文版Closed 3 years ago.
i\'m trying to understand java behaviour. Using this interfaces : public interface IA {} public interface IB extends IA {}
I\'d like to ask your opinion on this. This is a theoretical question. I\'m in a situation where I have an interface shown to a user that uses AJAX to talk to the server. The server-side language doe
I\'m writing a class that returns both a DataTable and a IEnumerable. I cannot define the interface methods exactly the same except for return type. So, I wish I could create this interface (obviously
I have this pimpl design where the implementation classes are polymorphic but the interfaces are supposed to just contain a pointer, making them polymorphic somewhat defeats the purpose of the design.
In a new Java project I try to apply as much best practices as possible. The one I\'m having problems with is immutability. Although I understood the concept and already built some immutable classes I
I开发者_如何学编程n COM, if I have an interface IBase and an interface IX which inherits from IBase, can I call methods of IBase through an IX pointer, and if not, why can I call Release() and AddRef(
I have a bunch of class who implement a common interface : Command. And this bunch of class goes to a Map.
加载中,请稍侯......