AccountController can\'t extend BaseAccount and BaseController at the same time. If I make all BaseAccount or BaseController methods empty, I can have an interface, but if I implement that int开发者_S
i\'m developing an application where all the pojos are exposed as interface but we map the real implementation class.we are using spring and JPA annotation.i\'m about to test the one-to-one relationsh
This question is in continuation to my previous post located here. Since there is no way to post code sample again without editing your original post, I am starting a new post. And also, this contains
Sorry for the poor title, can\'t think of a succinct way of putting this.. I\'m thinking of having a list of objects that will all be of a specific interface. Each of these objects may then implement
I have a data access library that has a few classes that all implement the same interface, which has a generic type parameter:
I am working with MVP in ASP.NET and wanted see if there is an easier/cleaner way to do this. I have a presenter with a view.It turns out I can reuse some of the view properties and presenter methods
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing
I have an interface which is now empty, and extends another interface. I\'d like to remove the empty interface and use the base interface, and am trying to find the correc开发者_开发知识库t refactorin
I wonder if there is a way to use constants in Interface Builder, in order to avoid manually setting the same color at different places for example (it could be a very tedious job sometimes...)
Is there a way to list/browse all ActiveX controls in the system o开发者_JAVA技巧r for particular application? Can this be done from some administration screen as well as in code?
加载中,请稍侯......