I\'ve just run into what I think is an oddity in type-casting. I have code similar to the following: interface IMyClass { }
I have a database with tables for each entity in the system.e.g. PersonTable has columns PersonId, Name, HomeStateId.There is also a table for \'reference data\' (i.e. states, countries, all currencie
I have a class like this: public class Foo<T> : IEquatable<T> where T : struct { List<T> lst;
For example, suppose I w开发者_开发知识库ant an ICar interface and that all implementations will contain the field Year.Does this mean that every implementation has to separately declare Year?Wouldn\'
This looks perfect for what I\'m trying to do. I need to stop mucking around with SendInput() and let someone else do it for me!
So, this is a question of coding style more or less. I\'m using Bean Validation here but the idea is the same for any interface that has simple implementations that aren\'t likely to get changed all t
I\'ve asked this question yesterday and got lots of good answers, only I just realized 开发者_运维技巧my question was wrong and here I want to rephrase it.
Yesterday I posted a question about the new/virtual/override keywords, and i learned a lot from your answers. But still i remain with some doubts.
I have an interface ITransaction as follows: public interface ITransaction { DateTime EntryTime { get; }
Hey guys, I have an interesting one for you here! I have one object, called Server, that implements two RMI interfaces, CSCP and ISCP.
加载中,请稍侯......