I am reading the book The Art of Assembly Language. I came across these two lines. the three byte encoding for mov ax, [1000] would be 0C6h, 00h,
Given a number, this program computes the factorial, but it no long works with number bigger than 9 .section .data
I need a common rule for warnings in x64 mode. Which way is better? Consider the following lines of some code
_memcpy_r SEGMENT memcpy_r PROC mov r10, rdi mov r11, rsi mov r开发者_如何学Pythondi, rcx mov rsi, rdx
8B EC 56 8B F4 68 00 70 40 00 FF 15 BC 82 40 A senquence like above can be segmented in various ways,each segment can be translated to corresponding assembly instruction, but each binary executable
What x86 register den开发者_C百科otes source location in movsb instruction?In 32-bit mode, esi. In specific, movsb copies one byte from ds:esi to es:edi, then increments or decrements both esi and edi
I currently have an assembly program which is modeled after the hexdump system function in Linux. Essentially, it prints the current line number, converts the binary values to hexadecimal strings and
I have a few questions about divide overflow errors on x86 or x86_64 architecture.Lately I\'ve been reading about integer overflows.Usually, when an arithmetic operation results in an integer overflow
With Blackfin processors, I can declare a开发者_运维百科 variable with \"l1_data\" attribute in gcc, and that variable stays in L1 data SRAM. Is there a way to do this on x86 or x86_64?No there isn\'t
I\'m trying to learn GCC inline assembly on Linux (x86), and my first experiment was to try and implement integer overflow detection for multiplication.It seems easy enough, but it is having side effe
加载中,请稍侯......