With mutable types, the difference in behaviour between value and reference types is clear: // Mutable value type
I\'m trying to return a mutable Sequence with an until loop, but i have an immutable seq in return of (0 until nbGenomes) :
I have a class with a property sampleNames. It is of type NSSet. The instance variable I plan to use will be NSMutableSet.
I am developing an app that creates a large number of small, immutable Java objects. An example might be:
In other words, can we model many to many relationships in a persistent data structure efficiently? A pair of unidirectional multimaps was suggested. However, I\'m not sure how this would work well
I have searched and found some info on this topic but the answers are either confusing or not applicable.
I am trying to figure out whether the following are immutable in Sage (which is built on Python so I believe if it is immutable in python, I believe in most cases it will be immutable in Sage)
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
JavaDoc of ImmutableSet says: Unlike Collections.unmodifiableSet, which is a view of a separate collection that can still change, an instance of this class contains its own private data and will ne
In a purely functional language, couldn\'t one still define an \"assignment\" operator, say, \"<-\", such that the command, say, \"i <- 3\", instead of directly assigning the immutable variable
加载中,请稍侯......