It is commonly suggested that immutable classes should be sealed, to enforce a promise to consumers that observed properties of the class will remain invariant.Certainly that would seem a good practic
This is just one of those \"I was wondering...\" questions. Scala has immutable data 开发者_如何学Pythonstructures and (optional) lazy vals etc.
When I say messaging classes I mean classes that are used strictly to get sent and be consumed by a consumer (or handler).
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, a
I\'d like to model an Address as a value object. As it is a good practice to make it immutable, I chose not to provide any setter, that might allow to modify it later.
I have a 2 D tuple (Actually I thought, it was a list.. but the error says its a tuple) But anyways..
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertis开发者_开发技巧e, but this question will likely so
Suppose I am trying to use GWT\'s RequestFactory to pass an immutable type between client and server, bidirectionally.Let\'s say the underlying type is TimeOfDay, which is designed to be immutable:
i have a large string (e.g. 20MB). i am now parsing this string. The problem is that strings in C# are immutable; this means that once i\'ve created a substring, and looked at it, the memory is wast开
I\'m going through Programming In Scala 2nd Edition by Odersky, Spoon, and Venners, and this example threw me for a loop since it seemed to go against what I thought was true about functional programm
加载中,请稍侯......