I do some heavy numbercrunching and for me floating-point performance is very important. I like performance of Intel compiler very much and quite content with quality of assembly it produces.
I am trying to define a full specialization of std::basic_string< char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char> > which is typedef\'d (in g++) by the <string> header.
See title开发者_Python百科Short Answer:
Please take a look at this code: template<class T> class A { class base { }; class derived : public A<T>::base
Assuming MyClass uses the default destructor (or no destructor), and this code: MyClass *buffer = new MyClass[i];
I\'ve some C++ projects, which does not use exception handling. What are the benefits 开发者_JAVA技巧of adding -fno-exceptions , or does gcc figure out itself that I don\'t use exceptions(nor any lib
although it\'s been said that the support for c++0x new features in g++ are in experimental mode, many gcc developer claimed that you can use most of the new features in your codes and get th开发者_JA
As a port, I\'d think it\'d be hard to keep it completely up to speed with GCC. Is it, or are th开发者_Go百科ere any differences with regards to standards compliance or features?On a version to versio
I won\'t post any code, because there is too much that could be relevant.But When I run my program it prints
Consider the following code: #include <iostream> #include <memory> #include <vector> using namespace std;
加载中,请稍侯......