I learned today about the term invalidation in co开发者_运维问答ntext of C++ containers. Can anyone explain what it means?
I\'m looking for a C++ container-like class that wraps a typed array of开发者_运维百科 objects that are not necessarily initialized and don\'t have to be default-constructible or copy-constructible. T
I am looking for some simple开发者_运维知识库 and efficient parameter container that would act like a in-memory-xml file representation (or ini-file, as another sample).
Is there a significant difference between doing this... if ( !myVector.empty()) { for ( unsigned int i = 0; i < myVector.size(); ++i ) {
suppose you need to implement container of a T items, whi开发者_Python百科ch its value could be retrieved by numeric index (which is random access) and by name (as string).
I\'d like clarification on the C++ standard, specifically where it says (my interpretation)in section 20.1.3 that \"for class T and an instance of class T called x, T(x) must be equivalent t开发者_开发
Similar to this question but with objects instead of pointers. If I have the following code Foo f; vector<Foo> vect;
Is there an easy way to check a container if it contains a value, not an object? This is the code I\'d like to work:
I was looking for some suitable 2D element container. What I want is the ability to iterate through every element of the container using, for example BOOST_FOREACH and I also would like to have an abi
This is a pretty straightforward architectural question, however it\'s been niggling at me for ages. The whole point of using a list, for me anyway, is that it\'s O(1) insert/remove.
加载中,请稍侯......