I require a linear vector container to behave like a multi-dimensional vector container. That is, a vector such as std::vector< std::vector< std::vector<int> > > be declared as std::
I\'ve been working on a school assignment that makes pretty heavy use of vectors, sets, stacks and queues.
I have this part of code: <ul> <li>First item</li> <li>second item <ul> <li>child</li>
I often heard that the boost library containers are more performant than the STL ones, because they don\'t allocate the objects internally. But isn\'t it as fast or even faster if we use a memory pool
I would need to maintain a list of about 20000 objects of a class. This class would be a managed wrapper for a c++ one. I would like to know if a ref class or a value class is they way to go.
Recently, I have seen some Matrix and 1D array classes implemented in C++ where each individual element is wrapped as a class (e.g. Element class). Normally, we like to have containers like Matrix to
I am showing a list of clients on a page and on the right side i have a calendar showing to schedule a new date for appoinment.When testing the output i found that if there are lot of clients coming o
I thought about storing some objects ... and now I don\'t know what to choose. So, now I have such code:
I typically get into the discussion with others and I\'m not able to confirm the behavior - if the container.end() and container.size() functions are inlined. For e.g. if we have a for loop as such:
First off: I searched half the web to find an answer with this as a solution that came closest. It is, however, too heavyweight for me though so I am looking a little less complex.