I have a bunch of functions that I want to put in either a separate namespace or a class. Out of the two, which would be better? If it\'s the latter, how should I go about it? I mean, I don\'t have an
I know I can do new char[n] to create an array of n chars. This works even when n is not a compile time constant.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. 开发者_如何转开发 Possible Duplicate:
Will C++11 move semantics and r-value refe开发者_开发百科rences in argument string constructs such as
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
I cannot understand when and how to use the new uniform initialization syntax in C++11. For example, I get 开发者_如何学Gothis:
I am trying to write a template function that accepts a std::function which depends on the template arguments. Unfortunately the compiler is not capable of correctly deucing the arguments to the std::
In this example code: explicit MyClass(std:开发者_如何学Python:wstring text) noexcept; Is the use of noexcept here correct? wstring can potentially throw on construction but does the throw happen b
When reading the slides about constexpr the introduction is about \"surprisingly dynamic initialization with consts\". The example is
Following the discussion on my answer to this question, apparently: the following code is allowed struct Foo {
加载中,请稍侯......