I wonder, because predefined literals like ULL, f, etc. are obviously resolved at compile time. The standard (2.14.8 [lex.ext]) doesn\'t seem to define this, but it seems to tend towards runtime:
There have been a few questions before on exporting a class which contains stl classes in relation to visual studio warning C4251: E.g. this question or this question.
I couldn\'t find an instance of how to do this, so I was hoping someone could help me out. I have a map defined in a class as follows:
Is there a usable alternative to Boost\'s bimap in C++0x? I would like to avoid Boost, but fully embrace C++11. If necessary, a slimmed down version of Boost\'s bimap would work for me (I need a const
I find in the new C++ Standard 2.11 Identifiers[lex.name] identifier: identifier-nondigit identifier identifier-nondigit
I am trying to create a base class that is a wrapper around std::array that overloads a bunch of common arithmetic operators. The end result will be sort of like std::valarray, but with static size.I\
I have a menu system that I want to initialise from constant data. A 开发者_开发百科MenuItem can contain, as a sub-menu, a vector of MenuItems. But it only works up to a point. Here are the bare bones
I\'m trying a controlled, learning experiment with my project and it involves creating my own collections and iterators, essentially an array and a linked list.There is something that I\'m missing sin
I\'ve basically implemented a proposal, my question is, has it been done, and if so, where? And/or is there a better way to do what I\'m doing? Sorry about the length of this post, I didn\'t know a be
Currently, I have: template <unsigned I, unsigned N, typename Tuple, typename UnaryFunction> struct for_;
加载中,请稍侯......