开发者_Python百科I came across this while testing some stuff for another question on initializing aggregates. I\'m using GCC 4.6.
I have a program where I must print many STL vectors on the screen after doing some calculation on each component. So I tried to create a function like this:
Taken from the C++0x FDIS (n3290): If a lambda-expression does not include a lambda-declarator, it is as if the lambda-declarator were (). If a lambda-expression does not include a trailing-return-t
I tried to compile this: enum class conditional_operator { plus, or, not }; But apparently GCC (4.6) thinks these are special, while I can\'t find a standard that says they are (neither C++0x n3290
I keep getting the following error when trying to write a template function: main.cpp|17|error: no matching function for call to ‘dotproduct(vector<float, 3u>&, vector<float, 3u>&
This is a follow-up to my previous question on pretty-printing STL containers, for which we managed to develop a very elegant and fully general solution.
Updated below. The following is the entire code I have in my main.cpp: template<class T> struct other_traits;
I\'m using MinGW 4.5.2 and I\'d like to use unordered_map from the tr1 namespace, not the one from std namespace that is enabled by passing -std=c++0x. I\'m sure this can be done since there are two u
>>> is lexed as >> >. But what happens if the first > closes a template argument list, should the result be equivalent to > > > or > >>?
(Note: tuple and tie can be taken from Boost or C++11.) When writing small structs with only two elements, I sometimes tend to choose a std::pair, as all important stuff is already done for that datat
加载中,请稍侯......