Consider the following code: class B { int x; public: B() : x( 10 ) {} int get_x() const { return x; } void set_x( int value ) { x = value; }
I don\'t quite get the purpose of th开发者_Python百科is data structure. What\'s the difference between std::multimap<K, V> and std::map<K, std::vector<V>>. The same goes for std::mul
I have a variadic template function which calls itself to determine the largest number in a list (constituted by the templatized arguments). I am trying to make a specialization for when the parameter
I just read an article on the C++0x standard: http://www.softwarequalityconnection.com/2011/06/the-biggest-changes-in-c11-and-why-you-should-care/
I had an bug cuz of this, and it made me wonder why it was designed that way. I feel that it would be better that auto something:container would produce references, not values.
See the below example: int arr[10]; int *p = arr; // 1st valid choice int (&r)[10] = arr; // 2nd valid choice
What kind of evil magic is it trying to do!?! I was listening to a Q&A session with herb sutter 开发者_开发知识库and one question was about concepts. Herb mention it made compilers slower (while
struct Test { static const int value = []() -> int { return 0; } (); }; With gcc-4.6 I get something like, error: function needs to be constexpr. I have tried multiple combinations of putting con
I know that at least one of the changes in C++11 that will cause some old code to stop compiling: the introduction of explicit operator bool() in the standard library, replacing old instances of opera
I have a very simple parser rule (for AXE), like this: auto space = axe::r_lit(\' \'); auto spaces = space & space & space;
加载中,请稍侯......