In this article on defining your own extensions to ::std::error_code the author recommends this code:
class Date { Date(int day, int month, int year) {} } int main() { Date d = Date(100, 2, 1990); } Here value(100) passed to day is not right, My question is how \'day\' parameter can be checked in co
In my following program I\'m currently using unordered_map just because I wanted O(1) search/insert time. But now I wanted the items to be ordered. Sorting it every time is very inefficient. What are
I am stuck on specializing a template function for a lambda : class X { public: template <typename T>
boost::condition_variable cond; boost::mutex mutex; //thread #1 for(;;) { D * d = nullptr; whil开发者_StackOverflow社区e( cb.pop(d) )//cb is a circular buffer and manage is own mutex/lock internally
I need a function wrapper for std::bind that will be called before the function it\'s wrapper, passing the arguments along to the wrapped functions.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: How much is too much with C++0x auto keyword
When we have, struct E { enum E_ { HELLO }; }; // \'E\' is inheritable then why do we need, enum class E { HELLO };// \'E\' is not inheritable
I\'ve looked at the standard but couldn\'t find any indication that simply writing to memory would be considered observable behaviour. If not, that would mean the compiled code need not actually write
Is is possible to write a anonymous enum class and then comparing what it contains? Eg. enum clas开发者_高级运维s { APPLE, BANANA } fruitType;
加载中,请稍侯......