I want to establish whether my understanding to some basic C++ reference principles are correct. To my understanding, declaring;
I noticed, that in [24.4.7] of the last C++-Std Doc N3291 max ist not constexpr: template<class T> const T& max(const T& a, const T& b);
Hi was I hoping someone would help understand this behaviour of the below code. #include <iostream>
I have the following (partial) code in a class where I try to evaluate a value against a list of values via metaprogramming in C++11.
Have no idea about C++11 type inference As I known, there are at least 3 type inferences in C++11: template deduce
I\'ve got a simple mixin, which I am mixing in to my other template classes. template<typename T> class mixin {
I\'m creating a custom iterator type, and the only use case right now is std::for_each. But apparently, it\'s not enough to mimic the pointer interface (I\'m only doing forward iteration), there are l
In VS 2010 SP1, the following: class Foo { public: Foo() { } Foo(Foo const&) = delete; // Line 365 Foo& operator=(Foo const&) = delete; // Line 366
开发者_开发问答 It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form
I was experimenting with some of the new C++0x features with G++.Lambdas, auto, and the other new features worked like a charm, but the range-based for-loop failed to compile.This is the program I was
加载中,请稍侯......