From the C++0x working draft, the new char types (char16_t and char32_t) for handling Unicode will be unsigned (uint_least16_t and uint_least32_t will be the underlyin开发者_StackOverflowg types).
I\'m trying to use C++0x, and in particular lambda expression and decltype to simplify some of my code, using the MSVC10 RC compiler.
I have a class containing a std::unique_ptr<> and I want to put instances of this class inside of an std::map<>. I thought one of the things that motivated the introduction of move semanti
I believe the new C++ standard allows for an extra \"scope\" for enumerated types: enum E { e1, e2 }; E var = E::e1;
Which is preferred boost::lock_guard or boost::mutex::scoped_lock? I\'m using Boost.Thread with the hope to move to C++11 threading when it becomes available.
Do they all inherit from a base class?Do I have to use templates? (I am referring to these http://www.codeguru.com/cpp/cpp/cpp_mfc/stl/article.php/c15319/)
Using range based for loops in C++0X, I know we\'ll be able to do : std::vector<int> numbers = generateNumbers();
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical andcannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clari
§3.10 section 9 says \"non-class rvalues always have cv-unqualified types\". That made me wonder... int foo()
I\'ve run into a strange problem. The following simplified code reproduces the problem in MSVC 2010: template <typename T>
加载中,请稍侯......