Is there a reason to use .Contains on a string/list instead of .IndexOf? Most code that I would write using .Contains would shortly after need the index开发者_JAVA百科 of the item and therefore would
var vTableExp = \"//a[contains(@href,开发者_如何学编程\'newdid\')]/ancestor::td/ancestor::tr/ancestor::tbody\";
I have two lists A and B, at the beginning of my program, they are both filled with information from a database (List A = List B).My program runs, List A is used and modifi开发者_开发问答ed, List B is
var list = (from i in _dataContext.aspnet_Users.Include(\"aspnet_Members开发者_开发知识库hip\")where i.UserName.Contains(userName)select i ).ToList();
I have a little problem which i can\'t solve. I want to use an SQL-In-Statement in Linq. I\'ve read in this Forum and in other Forums that I have to use the .Contains (with reverse-thinking-notation :
I\'m trying to use the .Contains() function on a list of custom objects. This is the list: List<CartProduct> CartProducts = new List<CartProduct>();
<div> <div>test</div> </div> $(\"div:contains(\'test\')\").css(\'display\',\'none\');
I am receiving a \"wildcard query expansion resulted in too many terms\" error when executing a query similar to the following:
I am trying to get my linq query to replicate my t-sql but I am lost. SELECT * FROM BaiDetail INNER JOIN
I am having problems with the following query in Castle ActiveRecord 2.12: var q = from o in SodisceFMClientVAR.Queryable