My tests may look like this: module(\"some module\"); test(\"test A\", ...); test(\"test B\", ...); module(\"other module\");
For fun, I\'m going to write my own implementations of common data structures like Linked List or Binary Sorted Tree. Are there any good test suites that already exist that I can use to make sure they
I want that my application catches the exceptions and e-mail them when running in production, but when I am running my MSTest unit tests I want it to throw the exceptions, so I can debug. My current c
I just watched this funny YouTube Video about unit testing (it\'s Hitler with fake subtitles chewing out his team for not doing good unit tests--skip it if you\'re humor impaired) where stubs get roun
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Is there a way to use mocks or fakes in your unit tests without having 开发者_StackOverflow中文版to use dependency injection or inversion or control?
What is the correct way to write unittests for things like serialization/deserialization or writing and reading objects to/from a repository? Should I test if each and every property of my objects is
Any Java unit testing framework that supports writing unit testing code like this: Collection<AType> myCollection = objectUnderTest.doSomething();
I\'m trying to use Test::More to unit test Perl functions that print to the screen. I understand tha开发者_运维技巧t this output may interfere with tools such as prove.
We are Silver开发者_StackOverflow中文版light Unit Test Framework for testing. Which one will be better for my team?Rhino Mocks or Moq.No one has any experience with using a framework like this.
加载中,请稍侯......