From the highest possible performance point of view, does the static vs dynamic library linking option have also impact on performance because of the higher cache-miss ratio for DLL?
I have a small exe file written in VB.NET which connects to database, gets the last row and send the information to the printer. It is just a small part of a program but it uses special font and also
I have a C++ .dll function that I am accessing through python 3.2 with the syntax: int Create(char argID)
I Have a DLL which开发者_如何学Go is made in vs6. Now I want to create that Dll in VS2008. So that all the functionality remains same.It shouldn\'t be too terrible, though the fact you\'re coming from
I create a C# application with an i开发者_StackOverflow中文版njector in it. I\'m using CreateRemoteThread & LoadLibrary technique to inject a C++ DLL into another process.
I\'ve been using reflection and LoadControl() to try and load a control dynamically from a DLL. I\'ve had a problem, though, loading it from elsewhere than the app\'s ~/bin folder.
I noticed that DLL compiled with the old VC6 (msvcrt.dll) still runnable and \"callable\" even into a DLL (or a program) t开发者_StackOverflowhat is linked against msvcr100.dll
I have seen a lot of libraries that are released in multiple frameworks.In any framework you choose, the library namespaces are the same, but the dll is compiled in .net 2.0, 3.5 or 4.0.
In VB I use the following to load a DLL into memory, and then I call functions in that DLL when I need to:
What are some applications/software that can reverse enginee开发者_StackOverflow社区r a .NET SQL assembly .DLL?I already know about Reflector, doPeek, and JustDecompile but am looking for other ones.I
加载中,请稍侯......