Consider the following Set benchmark: import scala.collection.immutable._ object SetTest extends App { def time[a](f: => a): (a,Double) = {
I\'m looking for an implementation of java.util.Set with the following features: Should be concurrent by no means of synchronized locking; So it\'s obvious that I don\'t want to use Collections.sync
Is it even possibl开发者_StackOverflow中文版e? Say you have private Set<String> names = new LinkedHashSet<String>();
I call a method which returns std::set<T> const& where T i开发者_JAVA百科s a class type. What I\'m trying to achieve is to check whether the set contains an object of type T with specific fi
I have a following problem I want to solve efficiently.I am given a set of k-tuples of Boolean values where I know in advance that some fraction of each of the values in each of the k-tuples is true.F
I\'m trying to convert some hard-coded inline onclicks to be dynamically created. Here\'s what they look like now:
This is probably very obvious, in fact so o开发者_Python百科bvious that no C++ reference I could find online cares to document it.
How 开发者_开发技巧can I do the equivalent of: !FIND_IN_SET(\'needle\', haystack) FIND_IN_SET returns the index of the match if it is found, and returns 0 if it is not found. Since 0 is FALSE you can
I need to find a best distance equation to find the distance between two sets. Distance equations are like euclidean, manhantan or any..I have to find the optimal minimal distance between two entiti
I need to optimize this code. Any suggestions to make it go faster, please tell me. I don\'t have a specific amount that I want it to go faster, any suggestion would be helpful. 开发者_如何学编程In te
加载中,请稍侯......