Lets say I have these DB rows id | storage | used | status 1-100-0-1 2-1000- 5000 -1 I need to compare开发者_运维百科 the rows \"storage\" and \"used\"
I have a MySQL SELECT query that calculates a distance using Pythagoras in the WHERE clause to restrict results to a certai开发者_C百科n radius.
Where I Begin- Dennis SheperdI hold on my heartI hold on for youBut I'm not sure what I ought to doI have fallen given inBut I fear I'll never winDo you think of meYou're where I want to b
Just Where I Belong- Emilie MoverI got my wishI found my wayAnd I got you to thankWhat more is there to sayYou开发者_高级运维 are the joy inside the songAnd I am just where I belongFeel it comin'
Where No One Goes- Jónsi /John PowellWritten by：John Powell/Jon Thor BirgissonLet the wind carry usTo the clouds hurry up alrightWe can travel so farAs our eyes can seeWe go where no one goesWe slow
I have several complex queries (using subqueries, etc...) and want to glue them together with OR or AND statement.
I\'m sure I must be making a trivial mistake here, but I\'ve been searching around for help with this problem and all I can find is information on conditional INNER JOINs.
I need to create a List with Data from a List<List<T>(). I do not need to convert the data; I only need to find Elements with specific information.
I have the following code in .net. foreach (string key in EntityNumbers.Keys) { if (EntityNumbers[key] != null)
I was wondering if anyone could help me understand why these two criteria do not return the same result sets. To me, it seems weird that SQL Server 2008 R2 wouldn\'t know to use the offset while const
加载中,请稍侯......