When I used valgrind to help debug an app I was working on I notice a huge about of noise which seems to be complaining about standard libraries.As a test I did this;
Could someone explain to me why adding a virtual function to the end of a class declaration avoids binary incompatibility?
I\'m using GCC 4.4.1 and GDB 7.0-ubuntu on Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala). However, GCC won\'t generate debugger information when using any of the following switches: -g, -g3, -ggdb, or -ggdb3.
I\'m having some trouble with this warning message, it is implemented within a template container class
When I compile something on my Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 PC it gets linked against glibc. Lucid uses 2.11 of glibc. When I run this binary on another PC with an older glibc, the command fails saying there\'s
I\'ve noticed a difference in behaviour for gcc\'s destructor when compiled under linux and crosscompiled with mingw.
I\'m writing a ray tracer. Recently, I added threading to the program to exploit the additional cores on my i5 Quad Core.
In the ARM ABI documentation I come across functions defined like: __value_in_regs struct bar foo(int a, int b) {
I wanted to check that typeid is evaluated at compile time when used with a type name (ie typeid(int), typeid(std::string)...).
I\'ve been thinking of how to implement a lock-free singly linked list. And to be honest, I don\'t see many bullet proof ways to do it. Even the more robust ways out there that use CAS end up having s
加载中,请稍侯......