I found out that using where with symbol :my_id => nil and using old school one with ? is different. Could anyone explain me why?
I\'m trying to m开发者_StackOverflowake a very simple query: $.ajax({ url: \"ajaxfunc.php\", dataType: \'json\',
The code I have is as follows: FILE *txt_file = fopen(\"data.txt\", \"r\"); if (txt_file == NULL) { perror(\"Can\'t open file\");
I have two DropDownLists in form, both displaying list of regions. First is required, second not, stored as null in db.
Recently a colleague at work told me not to use string.Empty when setting a string variable but use null as it pollutes the stack?
I have a notification set up in an activity.It creates the notification as expected.When I go back to the Home screen开发者_如何学运维, the notification is still up there, good.If I click on the notif
I often see in third party JavaScript code that after: var el = document.getElementById(elementId); object is often nulled a开发者_开发百科nd comment along this operation says that it is done for I
So if my store procedure is called with a null item I want to make it \'\' (otherwise it won\'t work with my result list)
On any of the \'major platforms\' (which I\'m defining as Windows, Mac and Linux for the purpose of this question,) is it conceivable for a validly allocated pointer to be allocated at address 0 in a
Outside of the argument of whether or not NULLs should ever be used: I am responsible for an existing database that uses NULL to mean "missing or never entered" data.It is different from emp
加载中,请稍侯......