Will it be possible and/or useful to define an operator \"\" (...) as a friend function? class Puzzle {
I wonder, because predefined literals like ULL, f, etc. are obviously resolved at compile time. The standard (2.14.8 [lex.ext]) doesn\'t seem to define this, but it seems to tend towards runtime:
My question sounds like a contradiction, but I don\'t know how else to refer to the new literal syntax other than user-defined-literal.
I am a little confused about overloading rules, let\'s say there are following literal operators, unsigned long long operator \"\" _xx(unsigned long long cooked_literal_int); //1
In another thread I introduced some techniques we would use for Model-Driven-Development in C++ once C++11 features, in particular user-defined literals, are available. I just revised the plans for GC
ty_126083483 2022-04-27 10:27 北京动物园里的动物很多，面积很大，非常适合小朋友来玩。操作方法01北京动物园在北京市西城区西直门，从北京市区乘坐地铁或者公交可以直达，门票15元。02北京动物园的大门口有一
加载中,请稍侯......