EDIT: solved see comments --don\'t know how to mark as solved with out an answer. After watching a Channel 9 video on Perfect Forwarding / Move semantics in c++0x i was some what led into believing t
Given a variadic macro of the form: #define MY_CALL_RETURN_F(FType, FId, ...) \\ if(/*prelude omitted*/) {\\
I\'ve read few papers about && and I\'m just curious if having: void fnc_1(int&& p) { //...
I\'m trying to implement a zip function.zip\'s parameters are each wrapped<Ti>, where Ti varies from parameter to parameter.
I very often see example of this form: template <typename T, typename U> auto add(T&& t, U&& u) -> decltype(std::forward<T>(t) + std::forward<U>(u))
I\'ve been looking into some of the new features of C++11 and one I\'ve noticed is the double ampersand in declaring variables, like T&& var.
Being not declared constexpr, std::forward will discard constexpr-ness for any function it forwards arguments to. Why is std::forward not declared constexpr itself so it can preserve constexpr-ness?
As I sit in the C++ Standards committee meetings, they are discussing the pros and cons of dropping Inheriting Constructors since no compiler vendor has implemented it yet (the sense being users haven
In perfect forwarding, std::forward is used to convert the named rvalue references t1 and t2 to unnamed rvalue references. What is the purpose of doing that? How would that affect the called function
have anyone come across a php code that convert text or doc into pdf ? it has tofollow the same format as the 开发者_如何转开发original txt or doc file meaning the line feed as well as new paragraph.
加载中,请稍侯......