Short question, why does Assert.AreEqual(1.0, double.NaN, 1.0) pass? Whereas Assert.AreEqual(1.0, double.NaN) fails.
When an assertion fails with Visual C++ on Windows, the debugger stops, displays the message, and the开发者_开发问答n lets you continue (or, if no debugging session is running, offers to launch visual
This question is close, but still not what I want. I\'d like to assert in a generic way that two bean objects are equivalent. In case they are not开发者_开发问答, I\'d like a detailed error message ex
I have a very big constant array that is initialized at compile time. typedef enum { VALUE_A, VALUE_B,...,VALUE_GGF
C开发者_Go百科ould you give an example where static_assert(...) (\'C++11\') would solve the problem in hand elegantly?
I have an EXE file using a DLL file which is using another DLL file. This situation has arisen: In DLL file 1:
I find myself writing the same argument checking code all the time for number-crunching: def myfun(a, b):
There appear to be Assert.assertArrayEquals() methods in Junit4 for开发者_运维知识库 all primitives other than double, e.g.
My asserts aren\'t generating message boxes, sometimes they send a message to debug output and end the thread without giving me a开发者_高级运维 more aggressive notification.How can I force all my Deb
Can I make assert throw an exception that I choose instead of AssertionError? UPDATE: I\'ll explain my motivation: Up to now, I\'ve had assertion-style tests that raised my own exceptions; For examp
加载中,请稍侯......