I have an object \'foo\', with an object literal as a property, as shown below. Inside that property, I\'d like to refer to the object \'foo\' rather than the object literal itself.
I have this stock rails 3.1 app, before even adding anything, I was testing to see if the assets are working as advertised
In JavaScript, why would one want to attach properties directly to the constructor? var Human = function() {};
I\'m dynamically loading jQuery and jQuery UI into a page, and I need to know when jQuery UI has successfully extended jQuery.
I notice that in CoffeeScript, if I define a function using: a = (c) -> c=1 I can only get the function expression:
class Foo a: -> x.call => super will not compile as I can\'t call super from anonymous class. However my
In CoffeeScript, though this code is almost identical to JavaScript: tabs_html = \"<div id=\'nm-container\'><ul><li><a href=\'#tabs-1\'>Guidelines</a></li><li&g
I am working on integrating automatic CoffeeScript compilation inside ASP.NET MVC projects. I already have the piece working where if you specify a .coffee file i开发者_运维知识库n a script tag, it co
I\'m trying to create methods dynamically in coffee script, but as my code shows, the iterator I use to create the methods doesn\'t rese开发者_Go百科t its variables between iterations and so I en up w
Sometimes we need to call a function by its name. I can do it in plain JavaScript as below: global=this
加载中,请稍侯......