Is there any side effect for this code: ///This code runs per requ开发者_JAVA百科est public static MyObjectContext CreateEntity()
I am using SQL 2008 and I am getting an error most of the time I run a stored procedure. There error is: could not continue scan with nolock due to data movement. I have looked online for this and it
I\'m modifying the commandtext of linq-to-sql to force it to use nolock, like this... if (db.Connection.State == System.Data.ConnectionState.Closed)
Given the following update statement: UPDATE @TableVariable SET city = T2.city FROM @TableVariable TV INNER JOIN dbo.TABLE_1 T1 WITH (NOLOCK)
Background: I have a performance-critical query I\'d like to run and I don\'t care about dirty reads.
Is 开发者_如何转开发there a way to run these queries as if I added a (NOLOCK) hint to them?If you really need this, then you want to do something like:
I know that in the Oracle DB I can configure a flag, that all select queries running on a specific DB can be run as if the N开发者_高级运维OLOCK hint was added.
I have two stored procedures running in separate threads, running on SQL Server 2005. One procedure inserts new rows into a set of tables and the other procedure deletes old data from the same set of
Is there a way to make WITH(开发者_开发问答NOLOCK) be applied on any SELECT statement run on a particular database?No but you can use the SNAPSHOT ISOLATION Database level on SQL Server 2005 and up, i
alamhan2006 2022-06-03 17:14 开发者_如何学Go女性假如月经不调是有大概作用试管小于1周岁的孩子手术失败几率的，因此提议女性针关于月经不调的情况，肯定要积极的选择检测，依据导致月经不调的原因适当的利用
加载中,请稍侯......