BestPractices: Out parameters vs complex return types in methods
Using complex return type:
Public Type TimeType
hours As Integer
minutes As Integer
End Type
Public Function ParseTimeField(time As String) As TimeType
Dim timeObject As TimeT开发者_如何学编程ype
Dim amountOfDigitHours As Integer
If time = "" Then time = "0"
If HasHoursAndMinutesParts(time) Then
amountOfDigitHours = GetAmountOfDigitHours(time)
timeObject.hours = CInt(Left(time, amountOfDigitHours))
timeObject.minutes = CInt(Right(time, 2))
Else
timeObject.hours = 0
timeObject.minutes = CInt(time)
End If
ParseTimeField = timeObject
End Function
Private Function HasHoursAndMinutesParts(time As String) As Boolean
HasHoursAndMinutesParts = Len(time) > 2
End Function
Private Function GetAmountOfDigitHours(time As String) As Integer
GetAmountOfDigitHours = Len(time) - 2
End Function
Call:
Dim timeObj As TimeType
timeObj = ParseTimeField(strTime)
OR using out parameters:
Public Function ParseTimeField(time As String, ByRef hours As Integer, ByRef minutes As Integer)
Dim timeObject As TimeType
Dim amountOfDigitHours As Integer
If time = "" Then time = "0"
If HasHoursAndMinutesParts(time) Then
amountOfDigitHours = GetAmountOfDigitHours(time)
hours = CInt(Left(time, amountOfDigitHours))
minutes = CInt(Right(time, 2))
Else
hours = 0
minutes = CInt(time)
End If
ParseTimeField = timeObject
End Function
Private Function HasHoursAndMinutesParts(time As String) As Boolean
HasHoursAndMinutesParts = Len(time) > 2
End Function
Private Function GetAmountOfDigitHours(time As String) As Integer
GetAmountOfDigitHours = Len(time) - 2
End Function
Call:
Dim hours As Integer
Dim minutes As Integer
Call ParseTimeField(strTime, hours, minutes)
BTW this is VB6 code =)
If you have a single return type, do not use an out parameter to return it.
In general, I find multiple ref
/out
parameters to be a code smell. If you need to return data from your method, it is better if it is in one coherent object.
I have a feeling we're going to see different opinions on this matter. Not sure there exists a best practice.
I usually prefer complex datatypes because I feel that is more in line with the original structure of functions where output parameter preceed the input parameters in the signature. Basically I don't like out parameters - they're superfluous. Whenever there's two ways of doing a thing in a programming language, you complicate unneccessary (guess I'm gonna get killed by Perl-fanatics stating this). You return data with the return statement. Period.
This said, I still find myself using out parameters often when I need to return two parameteres that have no natural grouping - i.e. would end up in a class which would be used solely in the return value of this specific function.
Whenever there's three or more parameters in the return data, I never use out simply because I find the calling code to be excessive verbose - needing to Dim the variables (or var'em in C#)
I tend to use out params as the universal style. Rarely need to implement helper functions that return UDT but these are usually private to the module so I can keep the scope of the UDT private to the module too.
In the latter case usually consume the retval like this
With ParseTimeField(strTime)
Debug.Print .hours, .minutes
End With
... and most probably would keep TimeType
with private scope.
Definately a matter of opinion. I do use ByRef
parameters from time to time, especially for utility functions which require a success/fail type scenario. For example, the TryParse
functions in the .net framework do exactly this. Your parametrised function could look like:
Public Function ParseTimeField(time As String, ByRef hours As Integer, ByRef minutes As Integer) As Boolean
'Do stuff'
ParseTimeField = True 'or false depending on output success'
End Sub
Meaning you can call it like:
Dim hours As Integer
Dim mins as Integer
If ParseTimeField(time, hours, mins) = True Then
'It worked'
End If
However as things start to get more complicated, and you're actually returning business items as opposed to doing logical commands, then a separate class and a return type is more desirable. It also makes calling AND returning easier to maintain.
精彩评论