How do I search for a String in an array of Strings using binarySearch or another method?

Using binarySearch never returns the right index

int j = Arrays.binarySearch(keys,key);

where keys is type String[] and key is type String

I read something about needing to sort the Array, but how do I even do that if that is the case?

Given all this I really just need t开发者_StackOverflowo know:

How do you search for a String in an array of Strings (less than 1000) then?

From Wikipedia:

"In computer science, a binary search is an algorithm for locating the position of an element in a sorted list by checking the middle, eliminating half of the list from consideration, and then performing the search on the remaining half.[1][2] If the middle element is equal to the sought value, then the position has been found; otherwise, the upper half or lower half is chosen for search based on whether the element is greater than or less than the middle element."

So the prerequisite for binary search is that the data is sorted. It has to be sorted because it cuts the array in half and looks at the middle element. If the middle element is what it is looking for it is done. If the middle element is larger it takes the lower half of the array. If the middle element is smaller it the upper half of the array. Then the process is repeated (look in the middle etc...) until the element is found (or not).

If the data isn't sorted the algorithm cannot work.

So you would do something like:

final String[] data;
final int      index;

data = new String[] { /* init the elements here or however you want to do it */ };
Collections.sort(data);
index = Arrays.binarySearch(data, value);

or, if you do not want to sort it do a linear search:

int index = -1; // not found

for(int i = 0; i < data.length; i++)
{
    if(data[i].equals(value))
    {
        index = i;
        break; // stop looking
    }
}

And for completeness here are some variations with the full method:

// strict one - disallow nulls for everything
public <T> static int linearSearch(final T[] data, final T value)
{
    int index;

    if(data == null)
    {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("data cannot be null");
    }

    if(value == null)
    {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("value cannot be null");
    }

    index = -1;

    for(int i = 0; i < data.length; i++)
    {
        if(data[i] == null)
        {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("data[" + i + "] cannot be null");
        }

        if(data[i].equals(value))
        {
            index = i;
            break; // stop looking
        }
    }    

    return (index);
}

// allow null for everything

public static <T> int linearSearch(final T[] data, final T value)
{
    int index;

    index = -1;

    if(data != null)
    {
        for(int i = 0; i < data.length; i++)
        {
            if(value == null)
            {
                if(data[i] == null)
                {
                    index = i;
                    break;
                }
            } 
            else
            {            
                if(value.equals(data[i]))
                {
                    index = i;
                    break; // stop looking
                }
            }
        }    
    }

    return (index);
}

You can fill in the other variations, like not allowing a null data array, or not allowing null in the value, or not allowing null in the array. :-)

Based on the comments this is also the same as the permissive one, and since you are not writing most of the code it would be better than the version above. If you want it to be paranoid and not allow null for anything you are stuck with the paranoid version above (and this version is basically as fast as the other version since the overhead of the method call (asList) probably goes away at runtime).

public static <T> int linearSearch(final T[] data, final T value)
{
    final int index;

    if(data == null)
    {
        index = -1;
    }
    else
    {
        final List<T> list;

        list  = Arrays.asList(data);
        index = list.indexOf(value);
    }

    return (index);
}

java.util.Arrays.sort(myArray);

That's how binarySearch is designed to work - it assumes sorting so that it can find faster.

If you just want to find something in a list in O(n) time, don't use BinarySearch, use indexOf. All other implementations of this algorithm posted on this page are wrong because they fail when the array contains nulls, or when the item is not present.

public static int indexOf(final Object[] array, final Object objectToFind, int startIndex) {
    if (array == null) {
        return -1;
    }
    if (startIndex < 0) {
        startIndex = 0;
    }
    if (objectToFind == null) {
        for (int i = startIndex; i < array.length; i++) {
            if (array[i] == null) {
                return i;
            }
        }
    } else {
        for (int i = startIndex; i < array.length; i++) {
            if (objectToFind.equals(array[i])) {
                return i;
            }
        }
    }
    return -1;
}

To respond correctly to you question as you have put it. Use brute force

I hope it will help

   public int find(String first[], int start, int end, String searchString){
    int mid = start + (end-start)/2;
    // start = 0;
    if(first[mid].compareTo(searchString)==0){
        return mid;
    }
    if(first[mid].compareTo(searchString)> 0){
        return find(first, start, mid-1, searchString);
    }else if(first[mid].compareTo(searchString)< 0){
        return find(first, mid+1, end, searchString);
    }
    return -1;
  }

Of all the overloaded versions of binarySearch in Java, there is no such a version which takes an argument of String. However, there are three types of binarySearch that might be helpful to your situation:

static int binarySearch(char[] a, char key); static int binarySearch(Object[] a, Object key); static int binarySearch(T[] a, T key, Comparator c)