开发者

Let syntax in Haskell

I have written the following solution for Problem 10 (99 questions) in Haskell :

{-- using dropWhile and takeWhile --}
enc :: (Eq a) => [a] -> [(Int, a)]
enc [] = []
enc (x:xs) = (length $ takeWhile (==x) (x:xs), x) : enc (dropWhile (==x) xs)

I wanted to rewrite the same solution but this time using a let syntax .

{-- using dropWhile and takeWhile / more readable --}
enc' :: (Eq a) => [a] -> [(Int, a)]
enc' [] = []
enc' (x:xs) = let num = length $ takeWhile (==x) (x:xs)
      rem = dropWhile (==x) (x:xs)
      in (num, x) : enc' rem

The second example is not working . The error is:

*Main> :l Problem10.hs
Compiling Main             ( Problem10.hs, interpreted )

Problem10.hs:16:38: parse error on input `='开发者_JAVA百科
Failed, modules loaded: none.

Where line 16 is this one: rem = dropWhile (==x) (x:xs)

Any suggestions ?

LE: Yes, it was an indentation problem . It seems that my editor (Notepad++) should be configured a little to avoid problems like this .


As already mentioned this is an indentation problem, it's caused by the line starting with rem being less indented then the previous line so it is not parsed as belonging to the previous let statement. A good way of determining how to indent in Haskell is the offside rule from Real World Haskell.

Also it is often a good idea to drop to a new line when starting your function with a let statement so to avoid wide indentation, like this:

enc :: (Eq a) => [a] -> [(Int, a)]
enc []     = []
enc (x:xs) = 
  let num = length . takeWhile (==x) $ x:xs
      rem = dropWhile (==x) (x:xs)
  in (num, x) : enc rem


As @templatetypedef points out, it is indeed the indentation. The rem = needs to be aligned with the num =.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜