Abstract classes and Pod::Coverage
I've recently star开发者_开发百科ted to try to use Dist::Zilla
for maintaining Path::Class
. I added the [PodCoverageTests]
plugin, and it's reporting some failures in the Path::Class::Entity
class, which is the abstract base class for Path::Class::File
and Path::Class::Dir
.
What I'd like is some way to tell the testing code that Entity
doesn't need docs, but its two derived classes do - even though the methods are only defined in the parent class. Anyone know some way to do that?
Dist::Zilla's standard POD coverage test uses Pod::Coverage::TrustPod.
You should be able to say
=for Pod::Coverage
.
to tell it to assume that everything is documented.
精彩评论