开发者

Scala: Producing the intermediate results of a fold

I've come 开发者_如何学JAVAacross the problem of maintaining a state throughout a map operation several times. Imagine the following task:

Given a List[Int], map each element to the sum of all preceding elements and itself.

So 1,2,3 becomes 1, 1+2, 1+2+3.

One solution I've come up with is:

scala> val a = 1 to 5                                                
a: scala.collection.immutable.Range.Inclusive with scala.collection.immutable.Range.ByOne = Range(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

scala> a.foldLeft(List(0)){ case (l,i) => (l.head + i) :: l }.reverse
res3: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15)

But somehow I feel that there has to be a simpler solution.


You're trying to compute the sequence of partial sums.

The general operation for computing such accumulations is not fold but scan, though scan is expressible through fold in the way you showed (and fold is actually the last element of the list produced by scan).

scala> List(1,2,3).scanLeft(0)(_ + _)
res26: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 3, 6)


@Dario gave the answer, but just to add that the scala library provides scanLeft:

scala> List(1,2,3).scanLeft(0)(_ + _)
res26: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 3, 6)


The scan answers are the best ones, but it's worth noting that one can make the fold look nicer and/or be shorter than in your question. First, you don't need to use pattern matching:

a.foldLeft(List(0)){ (l,i) => (l.head + i) :: l }.reverse

Second, note that foldLeft has an abbreviation:

(List(0) /: a){ (l,i) => (l.head + i) :: l }.reverse

Third, note that you can, if you want, use a collection that can append efficiently so that you don't need to reverse:

(Vector(0) /: a){ (v,i) => v :+ (v.last + i) }

So while this isn't nearly as compact as scanLeft:

a.scanLeft(0)(_ + _)

it's still not too bad.


I like to fold around just like everybody else, but a less FP answer is very concise and readable:

 a.map{var v=0; x=>{v+=x; v}}
0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜