开发者

EF4: Why isn't Translate() using Table mapping?

If I have db table like:

CREATE TABLE MyTable
(
MyTableId INT PRIMARY KEY,
MyTableName CHAR(10)
)

and entity in entity framework 4 (POCO, self tracking) defined as:

MyTable - maps to MyTable table
 - Id - maps to MyTableId
 - Name - maps to MyTableName

why does this query:

SqlConnection conn = (SqlConnection)((EntityConnection)context.Connection).StoreConnection;
conn.Open();
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM MyTable", conn);
DbDataReader result = cmd.ExecuteReader();
var objResult = context.Translate<MyTable>(result);

fail saying:

The data reader is incompatible with the specified 'Project1.MyTable'. A member of the type, 'Id', does not have a corresponding column in the da开发者_JS百科ta reader with the same name.

Shouldn't the Translate method take into account the table mappings defined in edmx? Is there any way to make this work without explicitly defining columns in query?


MSDN says:

The Translate method enables you to execute a standard ADO.NET query against a data source and translate the returned data rows into entity objects.

The supplied DbDataReader must contain data that maps to the requested entity type.

It isn't explicit whether it maps by name or via the map, but since this ADO.NET query isn't an entity query (and therefore isn't strictly tied to the abstraction layers), it seems reasonable that it might ignore it and opt for property-name matches.

I wonder if you should be writing an ESQL store query, rather than a TSQL database query? I would hope that an ESQL query is mapped via the model. This should be fairly simple; it could be just

var objResult = context.ExecuteStoreQuery<TEntity>(@"select * from MyTable");
0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜