开发者

Segmentation fault on time(0);

I'm rewriting an old program to do some new stuff, and suddenly I get a segmentation fault error on the following line of code:

time_t seconds_since_time_begun = time(0);

Why, oh why?

Update:

I have included the开发者_如何学Go time.h header file in my code, and when I tried what pmg suggested below, both variables were 4 in size.

When I tried the following:

printf("4\n");
// time_t seconds_since_time_begun = time(0);
printf("5\n");

I still get segmentation fault right after "4" has been printed, even when the line where time() is called is commented out. "5" is not outputted. How is this possible?

Update 2:

I rebuilt my function step by step to try to isolate where the error occurred in my code, and I think I found the problem. I'm not sure what was wrong but it had something to do with a comparison between an integer array value and 0. So, I don't think the segfault was caused by my call to time(0) .. but I'm still not sure what actually happened. Anyways, problem solved. Thanks guys.


Perhaps you have an absurdly large object in your stack frame that's overflowing the stack? See this blog post for a detailed example of how that can occur and an analysis of the situation. The time(2) function allows NULL to be passed to it, and it's highly unlikely your time() implementation has a bug.


If you have #include <time.h> the compiler knows that it needs to convert that 0 to a NULL pointer. Otherwise, it passes an int to the function.

I think your implementation treats (int)0 differently than (time_t*)0.

So ... add

#include <time.h>

to your code

Edit

Try this

#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>

int main(void) {
    printf("size of (int): %d\n", (int)sizeof (int));
    printf("size of (time_t*): %d\n", (int)sizeof (time_t*));
    return 0;
}


Often you will find that a segmentation fault will be caught on the incorrect line. What are the lines around it? Is it possible one of those could be causing it?

The standard library's time function take a time_t * as its argument, right? Hence, it's not > surprising you get a segfault: you're trying to dereference a NULL pointer!

time(0) or time(NULL) is the standard and accepted way to access the current time using the time function.

See reference.


Is it possible that your program contains a variable or local function namedtimethat's colliding with the standard library'stimefunction?


As pointed out by Adam Rosenfield, a program might segfault at the point of calling just any function (not just system calls) when it's out of stack space.

Now, your program might actually do need to store huge data on the stack rather than the heap. In this case, the solution might be to change the maximum stack space for your particular environment.

On Linux, it can be changed using ulimit, e.g.

ulimit -S unlimited


Lovely, but did you intend to pass it a null pointer as time(time_t *t)?

time(NULL);
time(((void*)0));

Not a zero?

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜