开发者

Inconsistent behavior in JavaScript's conditional checking

I want to build an object obj1 with property obj2, which is another object. To avoid redeclaring obj1 and obj2, I use the following code:

if (!obj1) obj1 = {};
if (!obj1.obj2) obj1.obj2开发者_JS百科 = {};
// code to use obj1

Assume, obj1 and obj1.obj2 aren't defined yet, the code causes the browser to report the error "obj1 is not defined".

If I change the code to:

if (typeof obj1==='undefined') obj1 = {};
if (!obj1.obj2) obj1.obj2 = {};
// code to use obj1

Then there's no error, while I think it should report "obj2 is not defined". I'm puzzled as to why the JavaScript treats the short-hand falsy check of a reference and a property differently. Can anyone shed a light on that?


If you would do:

if (!window.obj1) window.obj1 = {};
if (!obj1.obj2) obj1.obj2 = {};

You will find the code works as you expect.

obj1 isn't even a reference when you check it's existance; it's nothing. It doesn't exist because you haven't declared it (neither have you initialized it).

var obj1;

if (!obj1) obj1 = {};
if (!obj1.obj2) obj1.obj2 = {};

This will also work because you've declared the existance of obj1; you just haven't initialized it.

All properties of an object that haven't been set hold the value undefined; which is why it responds to your short hand !obj1.obj2

var obj1 = {};
obj1.a === undefined // true;

Variables however, must be defined before you can access them.


The "obj1" reference is not declared at all, as a result you get an error.

Use the following syntax for such kind of check:

var obj1 = obj1 || {};

By the way:

if (typeof obj1==='undefined') obj1 = {};

does not help if obj1 == null.

Don't declare global variables (without var). And I strongly recommend you to read the JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, 5th Edition. You may skip some chapters but pay your attention to Chapters 3, 7, 8, 9. They must be read and understood.


I think the latter code boils down to §8.7.1 and §8.12.3 in ECMAScript 5:

8.7.1 GetValue

  1. If Type(V) is not Reference, return V.
  2. Let base be the result of calling GetBase(V). If
  3. IsUnresolvableReference(V), throw a ReferenceError exception.
  4. If IsPropertyReference(V), then

a. If HasPrimitiveBase(V) is false, then let get be the [[Get]] internal method of base, otherwise let get be the special [[Get]] internal method defined below.

b. Return the result of calling the get internal method using base as its this value, and passing GetReferencedName(V) for the argument.

5. Else, base must be an environment record.

a. Return the result of calling the GetBindingValue (see 10.2.1) concrete method of base passing GetReferencedName(V) and IsStrictReference(V) as arguments.

8.12.3 [[Get]]

When the [[Get]] internal method of O is called with property name P, the following steps are taken:

8. Let desc be the result of calling the [[GetProperty]] internal method of O with property name P.

9. If desc is undefined, return undefined.

10 If IsDataDescriptor(desc) is true, return desc.[[Value]].

11 Otherwise, IsAccessorDescriptor(desc) must be true so, let getter be desc.[[Get]].

12. If getter is undefined, return undefined.

13. Return the result calling the [[Call]] internal method of getter providing O as the this value and providing no arguments.

As you can see, it only throws a ReferenceError here for IsUnresolvableReference. That applies if the base (obj1) is undefined. There is a list of places where ReferenceError is thrown in §15.11.6.3.


I tried to reconstruct it using chrome JScript console

If you add a watch expression to both obj1 and obj1.obj2 before your two lines both are of course not defined:

obj1: ReferenceError: obj1 is not defined

obj1.obj2: ReferenceError: obj1 is not defined

As soon as you go over this line if (typeof obj1==='undefined') obj1 = {}; all of a sudden they turn into

obj1: Object

obj1.obj2: undefined

So, you cannot check the first with ! because it is not undefined

Hope this helps

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜