Which list item is the most common
I'm trying to find the most common list item common([b,a,a,a,c,d,b,f,s,f,s,f,s,f,s,f,f],R) so the result should be R=f, I was thinking if we take the list , go to the end of the list take el=b ,num1=1 th开发者_StackOverflow社区en go back to the beginning and compare if b=b ,num1=num1+1 else a!=b then if num2=num2+1 , num1>num2 recursion else el=a or something like this, but i had some difficulty transforming it into Prolog.
insert_sort sorts the list , but for some interesting reason if i use las(X,Y)
(I override the original last/2
) I get 4-a if I use last(X,Y)
i get just a...
most_common([X|Y],J):-
insert_sort([X|Y],[R|Rs]),
count_runs([R|Rs],G),
las(G,J).
las([N-Y],Y).
las([_|T],Y):- las(T,Y).
las([_|Tail], Y) :- las(Tail, Y).
insert_sort(List,Sorted):-
i_sort(List,[],Sorted).
i_sort([],Acc,Acc).
i_sort([H|T],Acc,Sorted):-
insert(H,Acc,NAcc),
i_sort(T,NAcc,Sorted).
insert(X,[],[X]).
insert(X,[Y|T],[Y|NT]):- X @> Y, insert(X,T,NT).
insert(X,[Y|T],[X,Y|T]):- X @=< Y.
This looks like homework, so I'm not going to give you a full answer, but will suggest how you could solve it in one particular way, which isn't necessarily the best way:
Sort the list into sorted order (by standard order of terms if this is good enough): look at
sort/2
routines. e.g.,[b,a,a,a,c,d,b]
becomes[a,a,a,b,b,c,d]
.Take the sorted list and count the size of 'runs', perhaps to convert
[a,a,a,b,b,c,d]
into[3-a,2-b,1-c,1-d]
(where-
/2 is simply another term). e.g., consider the following code:
count_runs([E|Es], C) :-
% defer to count_runs/3 with an initial count of element E
count_runs(Es, 1-E, C).
% return the final count for Y elements if none remain (base case)
count_runs([], N-Y, [N-Y]).
count_runs([X|Es], N-Y, [N-Y|Rest]) :-
% if X is not equal to Y, record the count and continue next run
X \== Y, !,
count_runs([X|Es], Rest).
count_runs([_X|Es], N-Y, Rest) :-
% else X equals Y; increment the counter and continue
NPlusOne is N + 1,
count_runs(Es, NPlusOne-Y, Rest).
- Perform something like
keysort/2
to order the terms by the value of their keys (i.e., the numbers which are the counts, turning[3-a,2-b,1-c,1-d]
into[1-c,1-d,2-b,3-a]
). Then, the most-occurring elements of the list are the values at the end of the list with the same key value (i.e., here, this is thea
in the last term3-a
). In general, they may be more than one element that occurs the most (equally with another).
Good luck.
Based on Prolog lambdas, we use the meta-predicates tcount/3
and reduce/3
, as well as the reified term equality predicate (=)/3
:
:- use_module(library(lambda)).
mostcommon_in(E,Xs) :-
tcount(=(E),Xs,M),
maplist(Xs+\X^N^(tcount(=(X),Xs,N)),Xs,Counts),
reduce(\C0^C1^C^(C is max(C0,C1)),Counts,M).
Sample query:
?- mostcommon_in(X,[a,b,c,d,a,b,c,a,b]). X = a ; X = b ; false.
Note that this is monotone (unlike it's earlier quick-hack version). Look!
?- mostcommon_in(X,[A,B,C,D,A,B,C,A,B]), A=a,B=b,C=c,D=d. X = a, A = a, B = b, C = c, D = d ; X = b, A = a, B = b, C = c, D = d ; false.
Preserve logical-purity by
using list_counts/2
for defining mostcommonitem_in/2
as follows:
mostcommonitem_in(E,Xs) :-
list_counts(Xs,Cs), % tag items with multiplicity
maplist(\ (X-N)^(M-X)^(M is -N),Cs,Ps), % prepare keysorting
keysort(Ps,[Max-_|_]), % sort ascending by negated count
member(Max-E,Ps). % pick most common ones
Let's run a query!
?- mostcommonitem_in(X,[a,b,c,d,a,b,c,a,b]).
X = a ;
X = b ;
false. % OK
But, is it still monotone?
?- mostcommonitem_in(X,[A,B,C,D,A,B,C,A,B]), A=a,B=b,C=c,D=d.
X = A, A = a, B = b, C = c, D = d ;
X = B, B = b, A = a, C = c, D = d ;
false. % OK: monotone
Got speed? (compared to the pure answer I showed in my previous answer to this question)
% OLD ?- length(Xs,5), time(findall(t,mostcommon_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 854,636 inferences, 0.115 CPU in 0.115 seconds (100% CPU, 7447635 Lips) N_sols = 71, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...]. ?- length(Xs,6), time(findall(t,mostcommon_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 4,407,975 inferences, 0.449 CPU in 0.449 seconds (100% CPU, 9813808 Lips) N_sols = 293, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...]. ?- length(Xs,7), time(findall(t,mostcommon_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 24,240,240 inferences, 2.385 CPU in 2.384 seconds (100% CPU, 10162591 Lips) N_sols = 1268, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...]. % NEW ?- length(Xs,5), time(findall(t,mostcommonitem_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 4,031 inferences, 0.001 CPU in 0.002 seconds (93% CPU, 2785423 Lips) N_sols = 71, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...]. ?- length(Xs,6), time(findall(t,mostcommonitem_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 17,632 inferences, 0.002 CPU in 0.002 seconds (100% CPU, 9194323 Lips) N_sols = 293, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...]. ?- length(Xs,7), time(findall(t,mostcommonitem_in(E,Xs),Ts)), length(Ts,N_sols). % 82,263 inferences, 0.023 CPU in 0.023 seconds (100% CPU, 3540609 Lips) N_sols = 1268, Xs = [_,_,_,_,_,_,_], Ts = [t,t,t|...].
I could give you a high-level answer: You could sort the list and then it's relatively easy to count the items, one after another, and update what so far is the most common item.
精彩评论